courses:ast403:redshift-surveys
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| courses:ast403:redshift-surveys [2026/04/06 09:23] – shuvo | courses:ast403:redshift-surveys [2026/04/06 22:27] (current) – [DESI BAO Survey] shuvo | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| The instrument possessed a 2-degree field of view on the sky (roughly four times the diameter of the full moon) and utilized a robotic arm to position 400 optical fibers onto the focal plane. Each fiber was aligned with a pre-selected target galaxy. This allowed astronomers to capture the spectra—and thus the redshifts—of 400 galaxies simultaneously in a single observation. | The instrument possessed a 2-degree field of view on the sky (roughly four times the diameter of the full moon) and utilized a robotic arm to position 400 optical fibers onto the focal plane. Each fiber was aligned with a pre-selected target galaxy. This allowed astronomers to capture the spectra—and thus the redshifts—of 400 galaxies simultaneously in a single observation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | See how it works: [[https:// | ||
| **Survey Scope and Geometry: | **Survey Scope and Geometry: | ||
| Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
| //1. Mapping the Cosmic Web:// The 2dF slice maps provided stunning visual confirmation of the " | //1. Mapping the Cosmic Web:// The 2dF slice maps provided stunning visual confirmation of the " | ||
| //2. Matter Density:// By analyzing the way galaxies clustered and incorporating redshift-space distortions (the apparent squashing of galaxy clusters due to their peculiar velocities), | //2. Matter Density:// By analyzing the way galaxies clustered and incorporating redshift-space distortions (the apparent squashing of galaxy clusters due to their peculiar velocities), | ||
| - | **3. Upper Limit on Neutrino Mass:** The survey placed some of the first stringent cosmological limits on the total mass of neutrino species, as massive neutrinos would " | + | //3. Upper Limit on Neutrino Mass:// The survey placed some of the first stringent cosmological limits on the total mass of neutrino species, as massive neutrinos would " |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [{{ : | ||
| **2dFGRS and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: | **2dFGRS and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: | ||
| Line 40: | Line 45: | ||
| + | |||
| + | [{{ : | ||
| ===== SDSS BAO Survey ===== | ===== SDSS BAO Survey ===== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 52: | ||
| For graduate students studying large-scale structure, understanding the progression of SDSS is crucial, as its distinct phases introduced new observational techniques and targeted different cosmic epochs. | For graduate students studying large-scale structure, understanding the progression of SDSS is crucial, as its distinct phases introduced new observational techniques and targeted different cosmic epochs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | About SDSS: https:// | ||
| **The First Detection: SDSS-I and II (2000–2008): | **The First Detection: SDSS-I and II (2000–2008): | ||
| Line 52: | Line 61: | ||
| The 2005 detection localized the BAO peak at a comoving separation of approximately $100\ h^{-1}$ Mpc (equivalent to $r_s \approx 147$ Mpc) using a sample of about 46,000 LRGs out to $z \approx 0.47$. | The 2005 detection localized the BAO peak at a comoving separation of approximately $100\ h^{-1}$ Mpc (equivalent to $r_s \approx 147$ Mpc) using a sample of about 46,000 LRGs out to $z \approx 0.47$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [{{ : | ||
| **The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (SDSS-III, 2009–2014): | **The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (SDSS-III, 2009–2014): | ||
| Line 79: | Line 90: | ||
| + | [{{ : | ||
| **BAO Reconstruction: | **BAO Reconstruction: | ||
| Line 90: | Line 102: | ||
| By moving the observed galaxies backward along these estimated displacement vectors, the non-linear smearing is partially undone. This process drastically sharpens the BAO peak in $\xi(r)$, recovering lost information and significantly improving the statistical constraints on cosmological parameters. | By moving the observed galaxies backward along these estimated displacement vectors, the non-linear smearing is partially undone. This process drastically sharpens the BAO peak in $\xi(r)$, recovering lost information and significantly improving the statistical constraints on cosmological parameters. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== DESI BAO Survey ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | As we move to the present day in our lecture, we enter the era of " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operating from the Mayall 4-meter telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona, DESI began its main survey in 2021. Its primary objective is to measure the expansion history of the universe with exquisite precision to constrain the nature of Dark Energy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **The Instrument: A Marvel of Engineering: | ||
| + | The leap in efficiency achieved by DESI comes from its focal plane. Unlike older surveys that required astronomers to manually plug optical fibers into custom-drilled metal plates for each observation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | These automated micromotors can reconfigure the arrangement of the 5,000 fibers in a matter of minutes, aligning them with new target galaxies to an accuracy of a few microns. The light from these fibers is fed into ten spectrographs, | ||
| + | |||
| + | DESI focal plane: https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | **The Tracers: A Multi-Target Strategy: | ||
| + | To map the universe continuously from the local volume out to the era of matter domination, DESI utilizes a multi-target strategy, targeting different classes of objects at different redshifts: | ||
| + | |||
| + | //1. Bright Galaxy Sample (BGS):// Probes the low-redshift universe ($z < 0.4$).\\ | ||
| + | //2. Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs):// Extends from $0.4 < z < 0.8$.\\ | ||
| + | //3. Emission Line Galaxies (ELGs)// Star-forming galaxies mapped from $0.8 < z < 1.6$, representing the bulk of DESI's target catalog.\\ | ||
| + | //4. Quasars (QSOs):// Used both as discrete density tracers ($1.6 < z < 2.1$) and as backlights for the **Lyman-$\alpha$ forest** ($z > 2.1$). | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **DESI Year 1 (Y1) Results and Cosmological Constraints: | ||
| + | In April 2024, the DESI collaboration released its Year 1 (Y1) cosmology results, analyzing a map comprising over 6 million extragalactic objects—already the largest and most precise 3D map of the universe ever constructed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The DESI Y1 BAO measurements successfully isolated the comoving sound horizon scale across seven distinct redshift bins ranging from $z = 0.1$ to $z = 4.2$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | On its own, the DESI BAO data proved highly consistent with a spatially flat $\Lambda$CDM universe, yielding a tightly constrained matter density parameter: | ||
| + | $$\Omega_m = 0.295 \pm 0.015$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | When combined with Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data from the Planck satellite, the derived Hubble constant is measured at: | ||
| + | $$H_0 = 67.97 \pm 0.38 \text{ km s}^{-1} \text{ Mpc}^{-1}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **The Evolving Equation of State: A Hint of New Physics? | ||
| + | The most highly discussed outcome of the DESI Y1 data release pertained to the equation of state of Dark Energy, denoted as $w$. In the standard $\Lambda$CDM model, dark energy is a cosmological constant ($\Lambda$), | ||
| + | $$w = \frac{p}{\rho c^2} = -1$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, cosmologists test alternative models where dark energy is dynamic (e.g., quintessence), | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$w(a) = w_0 + w_a (1 - a)$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here:\\ | ||
| + | * $w_0$ is the current value of the dark energy equation of state at $z = 0$.\\ | ||
| + | * $w_a$ dictates how quickly $w$ evolves with time.\\ | ||
| + | * (Note: $\Lambda$CDM strictly requires $w_0 = -1$ and $w_a = 0$).\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | When the DESI collaboration combined their Y1 BAO measurements with CMB data and Type Ia Supernova data, the statistical fit preferred a parameter space where **$w_0 > -1$ and $w_a < 0$**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Depending on the specific supernova dataset used (e.g., Pantheon+, Union3, or DES-SN5YR), the combined data deviated from the standard $\Lambda$CDM prediction by roughly **$2.5\sigma$ to $3.9\sigma$**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | While this does not meet the $5\sigma$ threshold required to officially claim a " | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [{{ : | ||
courses/ast403/redshift-surveys.1775489003.txt.gz · Last modified: by shuvo
