Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- un:radio-inter [2024/09/08 22:39] – [1.2 Correlation interferometer] asad
+++ un:radio-inter [2024/09/08 23:26] (current) – [1.2 Correlation interferometer] asad
@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 which can be reduced to only a fringe (interferential) term
-$$ R_{AB}(\tau) = \frac{1}{2} \langle V_AV_B\cos\omega\tau. \rangle $$
+$$ R_{AB}(\tau) = \frac{1}{2} \langle V_AV_B\cos\omega\tau \rangle $$
+where the total-power terms are absent, unlike the equation for the adding interferometer, and this is plotted below.
+{{:un:correlation-interferometer.jpg?nolink&600|}}
+The dotted and dashed curves represent two signals (detected by two antennas) phase-shifted with respect to each other, the solid curve shows their multiplication and the solid line the corresponding time-average. As the direction toward the source changes (due to the rotation of the earth), $\tau$ changes and so does the relative phase. At the top phase shift is close to zero, in the middle it becomes $90^\circ$, and at the bottom $180^\circ$. The //fringe amplitude// varies from $+0.5$ to $-0.5$. One cycle of the RF phase shift corresponds to one //fringe cycle//.
+{{:un:fringe-cycles.jpg?nolink&650|}}
+Here you see the fringe oscillations (cycles) for a point source located on the celestial equator observed by a two-element interferometer lying along the terrestrial equator creating a 15-$\lambda$ long east-west baseline.
+The fringes oscillate around a zero mean and there are exactly 15 maxima on each side of the center, where $\theta=0^\circ$. The fringes near the center are more sinusoidal because there the small-angle approximation ($\sin\theta=\theta$) is more applicable. As $b_\lambda=15$, $\lambda/b=1/15 \sim 4^\circ$ which is the angular separation between successive lobes. The //fringe spacing// increases away from the center because the projected baseline $b\cos\theta$ decreases.