Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
un:brightness [2024/06/02 06:27] – asad | un:brightness [2024/06/02 06:36] (current) – asad | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Brightness | + | ====== Brightness ====== |
- | Astronomers measure the brightness of an astronomical object as a function of direction, frequency, time and polarization. Therefore, it is very important to understand the distance-independent quantity **brightness** and the distance-dependent quantity **flux**. If you take three pictures of the Sun from Venus, Earth and Mars, you will find the same brightness | + | Astronomers measure the brightness of an astronomical object as a function of direction, frequency, time and polarization. Therefore, it is very important to understand the distance-independent quantity **intensity** and the distance-dependent quantity **flux**. If you take three pictures of the Sun from Venus, Earth and Mars, you will find the same intensity |
- | ===== Brightness | + | ===== Intensity |
- | **Brightness** and **intensity** are sometimes used to mean different things: brightness is the true power emitted by the source per unit area per unit solid angle, and intensity the power per unit area per unit solid angle along the path to a detector. If there is no **absorption**, | + | **Brightness** and **intensity** are sometimes used to mean different things: brightness is the true power emitted by the source per unit area per unit solid angle, and intensity the power per unit area per unit solid angle along the path to a detector. If there is no **absorption**, |
We will use the **ray-optics approximation** to define brightness and flux. Here we assume that light travels as bullets of photons along straight lines. The assumption is good only if the emitting source is much larger than the wavelength of the emitted radiation which is almost always true in astronomy. | We will use the **ray-optics approximation** to define brightness and flux. Here we assume that light travels as bullets of photons along straight lines. The assumption is good only if the emitting source is much larger than the wavelength of the emitted radiation which is almost always true in astronomy. | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
===== Flux ===== | ===== Flux ===== | ||
- | From the unit of **flux density** | + | From the unit of **flux density** W m$^{-2}$ Hz$^{-1}$, we can write the definition as |
$$ \frac{dP}{d\sigma\ d\nu} = I_\nu \cos\theta\ d\Omega. $$ | $$ \frac{dP}{d\sigma\ d\nu} = I_\nu \cos\theta\ d\Omega. $$ | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Flux depends on distance because $S_\nu \propto \int d\Omega \propto 1/d^2$ following an inverse-square law. Similar to total intensity, total flux can be calculated by integrating the flux density over all frequencies. | Flux depends on distance because $S_\nu \propto \int d\Omega \propto 1/d^2$ following an inverse-square law. Similar to total intensity, total flux can be calculated by integrating the flux density over all frequencies. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Luminosity ===== | ||
+ | The spectral (or specific) intensity | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ L_\nu = 4\pi d^2 S_\nu $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | where $d$ is the distance between the source and the observer. It does not depend on distance because the $d^2$ is cancelled by the $1/d^2$ dependence of $S_\nu$. Total luminosity | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ L_\nu = \int_0^\infty L_\nu d\nu $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | is nothing but the true **power** of a source in watts (W). This is also called **bolometric luminosity** because bolometers are broadband detectors that could measure radiation at all frequencies by measuring the induced heat. | ||
un/brightness.1717331277.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/06/02 06:27 by asad