un:blackbody-radiation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| un:blackbody-radiation [2025/11/29 10:33] – [Blackbody spectra] asad | un:blackbody-radiation [2025/12/06 10:58] (current) – asad | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Blackbody radiation ====== | ====== Blackbody radiation ====== | ||
| - | Blackbody radiation | + | Blackbody radiation |
| - | When matter and radiation are in equilibrium, | + | ===== Specific intensity ===== |
| - | $$ | + | The fundamental descriptor |
| - | \frac{3}{2} kT = \left( \frac{1}{2} mv^2 \right)_{av} = h \nu_{\mathrm{av}}. | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | A hypothetical container with walls and gas at temperature \( T \) would produce this equilibrium spectrum exactly. Although astrophysical environments are more complex than an ideal cavity, sufficiently high density and optical thickness allow photons to reach the same statistical equilibrium state. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Planck spectrum ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The distribution | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | f = \frac{2}{h^3} \frac{1}{e^{h\nu/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | From this distribution one obtains | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | I_\nu(T) = \frac{2 h \nu^3}{c^2} \frac{1}{e^{h\nu/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | which is known as the Planck function. It gives the radiant | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | I_\lambda(T) = \frac{2 h c^2}{\lambda^5} \frac{1}{e^{hc/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | While these two forms describe the same radiation field, their peaks occur at different numerical locations because frequency and wavelength depend on each other nonlinearly. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Rayleigh–Jeans and Wien regimes ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | At low frequencies where \( h\nu \ll kT \), the exponential in the denominator can be expanded using a Taylor series: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | e^{h\nu/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Substituting this into the Planck function yields the Rayleigh–Jeans approximation, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | I_\nu(T) \approx \frac{2 \nu^2 kT}{c^2}, | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | which grows quadratically with frequency and linearly with temperature. This form applies to radio and microwave wavelengths where photon energies are much smaller than the thermal energy scale. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | At high frequencies where \( h\nu \gg kT \), the exponential term dominates and Planck’s law reduces to the Wien approximation, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | I_\nu(T) \approx \frac{2 h \nu^3}{c^2} e^{-h\nu/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This approximation describes the exponential falloff at short wavelengths. The location of the maximum of \( I_\nu(T) \) is determined by setting the derivative with respect to frequency equal to zero, which gives | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | \nu_{\mathrm{peak}} = 5.88 \times 10^{10} T. | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Thus the peak frequency scales directly with temperature. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Displacement law and peak ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Because \( I_\nu \) and \( I_\lambda \) have different functional forms, the peak of the wavelength spectrum does not occur at \( \lambda = c/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | T \lambda_{\mathrm{peak}} = 2.898 \times 10^{-3} \ \mathrm{m\, | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Increasing the temperature therefore shifts the peak emission to shorter wavelengths. Cold sources of a few kelvin peak in the millimeter regime, while hotter bodies with temperatures of thousands of kelvin peak in the visible or ultraviolet. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Flux and luminosity ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Integrating the Planck function over all frequencies gives the total radiation energy density. The number density of photons varies as \( T^3 \), while the radiation energy density varies as \( T^4 \). The total flux emerging from a unit surface area is given by the Stefan–Boltzmann law, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | F = \sigma T^4. | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | A spherical star of radius \( R \) radiates a luminosity | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | L = 4\pi R^2 \sigma T^4. | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This connects the effective temperature of a radiating surface to its total output of energy and allows estimates of stellar radii and luminosities when the flux and temperature are known. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Blackbody spectra ===== | + | |
| - | When blackbody spectra are plotted as functions of frequency, \(I(\nu)\), several consistent trends appear. At low frequencies the curves rise approximately as \(\nu^{2}\), | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In the wavelength representation, | + | |
| < | < | ||
| Line 99: | Line 12: | ||
| #bb_nu, #bb_lambda { | #bb_nu, #bb_lambda { | ||
| width: 100%; | width: 100%; | ||
| - | height: | + | height: |
| position: relative; | position: relative; | ||
| margin-bottom: | margin-bottom: | ||
| Line 119: | Line 32: | ||
| <div style=" | <div style=" | ||
| Temperature: | Temperature: | ||
| - | <input type=" | + | <input type=" |
| | | ||
| <span id=" | <span id=" | ||
| Line 133: | Line 46: | ||
| const h=6.626e-34, | const h=6.626e-34, | ||
| - | // Logarithmic x-grids (Hz and m) chosen to show peaks well for T=100–50000 K | ||
| const N=400; | const N=400; | ||
| const logspace=(a, | const logspace=(a, | ||
| - | // Frequency in Hz: 10^11–10^17 Hz (radio/IR → UV/soft X-ray) | ||
| const nu_Hz = logspace(11, | const nu_Hz = logspace(11, | ||
| - | |||
| - | // Wavelength in m: 10^-8–10^-3 m (UV → mm), covering peaks from 50,000 K to 100 K | ||
| const lambda_m | const lambda_m | ||
| - | // Planck functions | ||
| const Bnu = (nu, | const Bnu = (nu, | ||
| const Blambda = (lam, | const Blambda = (lam, | ||
| - | // Traces | ||
| const makeNuTrace = T => ({ | const makeNuTrace = T => ({ | ||
| x: nu_Hz, | x: nu_Hz, | ||
| Line 162: | Line 69: | ||
| }); | }); | ||
| - | // Layouts — ONLY x-axis logarithmic | + | // BIG equation text |
| + | const eq_nu = { | ||
| + | | ||
| + | text:' | ||
| + | showarrow: | ||
| + | font: | ||
| + | align:' | ||
| + | }; | ||
| + | |||
| + | const eq_lambda = { | ||
| + | x: 0.97, y: 0.97, xref:' | ||
| + | text:' | ||
| + | showarrow: | ||
| + | font: | ||
| + | align:' | ||
| + | }; | ||
| const layout_nu = { | const layout_nu = { | ||
| margin: | margin: | ||
| xaxis: | xaxis: | ||
| - | yaxis: | + | yaxis: |
| + | annotations: | ||
| }; | }; | ||
| Line 172: | Line 96: | ||
| margin: | margin: | ||
| xaxis: | xaxis: | ||
| - | yaxis: | + | yaxis: |
| + | annotations: | ||
| }; | }; | ||
| - | // Initial plots | ||
| Plotly.newPlot(' | Plotly.newPlot(' | ||
| Plotly.newPlot(' | Plotly.newPlot(' | ||
| - | // Slider interactivity | ||
| const slider=document.getElementById(' | const slider=document.getElementById(' | ||
| const Tval=document.getElementById(' | const Tval=document.getElementById(' | ||
| Line 194: | Line 117: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | ===== Insights | + | The derivation of the blackbody spectrum relies on the Bose-Einstein distribution function, which describes the statistical behavior of integer-spin particles (bosons) such as photons. In a phase space defined by position coordinates $\mathbf{x}$ and momentum vectors $\mathbf{p}$, |
| - | * Blackbody radiation arises when photons and matter reach full thermal | + | $$f = \frac{2}{h^3} \frac{1}{e^{E/ |
| - | | + | Here, $h$ is Planck' |
| - | * The Rayleigh–Jeans and Wien limits describe | + | |
| - | | + | The specific intensity $I(\nu, T)$ is directly related to this phase-space density. Since photons travel at speed $c$, the intensity is the energy carried by photons passing through a surface, which equates to the product of the energy per photon $h\nu$, the phase space density $f$, the factor $c/4\pi$ related to isotropic solid angle integration, |
| - | | + | $$I(\nu, T) = \frac{2h\nu^3}{c^2} \frac{1}{e^{h\nu/ |
| - | * Dense, optically thick astrophysical regions such as stellar atmospheres | + | This equation forms the basis for all subsequent characteristics of blackbody radiation. |
| - | * Blackbody sources serve as calibration standards because their emission | + | |
| + | ===== Rayleigh-Jeans approximation | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the low-frequency limit, where the photon energy is much smaller than the thermal | ||
| + | $$I(\nu, T) \approx \frac{2\nu^2 kT}{c^2}$$ | ||
| + | This approximation was historically significant as it corresponds to the classical prediction | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Wien approximation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | At the opposite end of the spectrum, where frequencies are high and photon energy exceeds the thermal kinetic energy ($h\nu \gg kT$), the exponential term $e^{h\nu/ | ||
| + | $$I(\nu, T) \approx \frac{2h\nu^3}{c^2} e^{-h\nu/ | ||
| + | This is the Wien approximation. It describes | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Wien's displacement law (frequency) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The spectral distribution of blackbody radiation peaks at a specific frequency $\nu_{peak}$ that shifts with temperature. Differentiating | ||
| + | $$h\nu_{peak} = 2.82 kT$$ | ||
| + | This relationship implies that hotter objects emit the bulk of their energy at higher frequencies. For example, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Wien's displacement law (wavelength) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | When the specific intensity is expressed per unit wavelength interval, $I_\lambda(\lambda, | ||
| + | $$\lambda_{peak} T = 2.898 \times 10^{-3} \text{ K m}$$ | ||
| + | It is important to recognize | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Stefan-Boltzmann law ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The total radiant flux $\mathcal{F}$ emitted from the surface of a blackbody is obtained by integrating the specific intensity over all frequencies ($0 \to \infty$) and over the outward-facing hemisphere of solid angles. The integration over solid angle contributes a factor of $\pi$, and the frequency integral yields a dependence on the fourth power of temperature: | ||
| + | $$\mathcal{F} = \sigma T^4$$ | ||
| + | where $\sigma \approx 5.67 \times 10^{-8} \text{ W m}^{-2} \text{ K}^{-4}$ is the Stefan-Boltzmann | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Spectral energy density ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The spectral energy density $u_\nu(\nu, T)$ measures the amount of radiant energy contained within a unit volume of space per unit frequency interval. For isotropic radiation, the energy density is related to the specific intensity by a factor of $4\pi/c$. This accounts for radiation traveling in all directions within the volume: | ||
| + | $$u_\nu(\nu, | ||
| + | This function describes the " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Total energy density ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Integrating the spectral energy density over the entire frequency range yields the total energy density $u(T)$, representing the total joules of radiation energy per cubic meter. Like the flux, this quantity scales with the fourth power of the temperature: | ||
| + | $$u(T) = a T^4$$ | ||
| + | The radiation constant $a$ is related | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Spectral number density ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The spectral number density $n_\nu(\nu, T)$ defines the number of photons per unit volume per unit frequency interval. It is derived by dividing the spectral energy density $u_\nu$ by the energy of a single photon, $h\nu$: | ||
| + | $$n_\nu(\nu, | ||
| + | Physically, this can be interpreted | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Total number density ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The total number density of photons $n(T)$ is found by integrating $n_\nu$ over all frequencies. The result | ||
| + | $$n(T) \propto T^3$$ | ||
| + | Specifically, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Average photon energy ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The average energy of a photon in a blackbody radiation field is the ratio of the total energy density to the total number density ($u/n$). Since $u \propto T^4$ and $n \propto T^3$, the average energy is directly proportional to $T$: | ||
| + | $$h\nu_{avg} \approx 2.70 kT$$ | ||
| + | This value provides a useful rule of thumb for characteristic photon energies. It is slightly lower than the energy at the frequency peak ($2.82 kT$) but provides a representative energy for interactions such as ionization or scattering within a thermal plasma. | ||
| ===== Inquiries ===== | ===== Inquiries ===== | ||
| - | | + | |
| - | * Why do the Rayleigh–Jeans and Wien approximations follow from the limiting behavior of the exponential term in Planck’s law? | + | |
| - | | + | - Using the scaling relations provided, determine the factor by which the total luminosity of a spherical star increases if its temperature doubles while its radius remains constant. |
| + | - Contrast the temperature dependence of the total photon energy density ($u \propto T^4$) with that of the total photon number density ($n \propto T^3$) and explain what this implies for the average energy per photon as temperature changes. | ||
| + | - State the equation of state relating radiation pressure $P$ to total energy density $u$ for an isotropic blackbody field and identify the factor distinguishing it from the kinetic pressure of a non-relativistic gas. | ||
un/blackbody-radiation.1764437632.txt.gz · Last modified: by asad
