un:blackbody-radiation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| un:blackbody-radiation [2025/11/29 10:10] – [Blackbody spectra] asad | un:blackbody-radiation [2025/12/06 10:58] (current) – asad | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Blackbody radiation ====== | ====== Blackbody radiation ====== | ||
| - | Blackbody radiation | + | Blackbody radiation |
| - | When matter and radiation are in equilibrium, | + | ===== Specific intensity ===== |
| - | $$ | + | The fundamental descriptor |
| - | \frac{3}{2} kT = \left( \frac{1}{2} mv^2 \right)_{av} = h \nu_{\mathrm{av}}. | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | A hypothetical container with walls and gas at temperature \( T \) would produce this equilibrium spectrum exactly. Although astrophysical environments are more complex than an ideal cavity, sufficiently high density and optical thickness allow photons to reach the same statistical equilibrium state. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Planck spectrum ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The distribution | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | f = \frac{2}{h^3} \frac{1}{e^{h\nu/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | From this distribution one obtains | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | I_\nu(T) = \frac{2 h \nu^3}{c^2} \frac{1}{e^{h\nu/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | which is known as the Planck function. It gives the radiant | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | I_\lambda(T) = \frac{2 h c^2}{\lambda^5} \frac{1}{e^{hc/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | While these two forms describe the same radiation field, their peaks occur at different numerical locations because frequency | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Rayleigh–Jeans and Wien regimes ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | At low frequencies where \( h\nu \ll kT \), the exponential in the denominator can be expanded using a Taylor series: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | e^{h\nu/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Substituting this into the Planck function yields the Rayleigh–Jeans approximation, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | I_\nu(T) \approx \frac{2 \nu^2 kT}{c^2}, | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | which grows quadratically with frequency and linearly with temperature. This form applies to radio and microwave wavelengths where photon energies are much smaller than the thermal energy scale. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | At high frequencies where \( h\nu \gg kT \), the exponential term dominates and Planck’s law reduces to the Wien approximation, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | I_\nu(T) \approx \frac{2 h \nu^3}{c^2} e^{-h\nu/ | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This approximation describes the exponential falloff at short wavelengths. The location of the maximum of \( I_\nu(T) \) is determined | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | \nu_{\mathrm{peak}} = 5.88 \times 10^{10} T. | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Thus the peak frequency scales directly with temperature. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Displacement law and peak ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Because \( I_\nu \) and \( I_\lambda \) have different functional forms, the peak of the wavelength spectrum does not occur at \( \lambda = c/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | T \lambda_{\mathrm{peak}} = 2.898 \times 10^{-3} \ \mathrm{m\, | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Increasing the temperature therefore shifts the peak emission to shorter wavelengths. Cold sources of a few kelvin peak in the millimeter regime, while hotter bodies with temperatures of thousands of kelvin peak in the visible or ultraviolet. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Flux and luminosity ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Integrating the Planck function over all frequencies gives the total radiation energy density. The number density of photons varies as \( T^3 \), while the radiation energy density varies as \( T^4 \). The total flux emerging from a unit surface area is given by the Stefan–Boltzmann law, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | F = \sigma T^4. | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | A spherical star of radius \( R \) radiates a luminosity | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | L = 4\pi R^2 \sigma T^4. | + | |
| - | $$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This connects the effective temperature of a radiating surface to its total output of energy and allows estimates of stellar radii and luminosities when the flux and temperature are known. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Blackbody spectra ===== | + | |
| - | When blackbody spectra are plotted as functions of frequency, \(I(\nu)\), several consistent trends appear. At low frequencies the curves rise approximately as \(\nu^2\), following the Rayleigh–Jeans form that emerges from the classical limit of the Planck law. At high frequencies the intensity drops exponentially, | + | |
| < | < | ||
| Line 97: | Line 12: | ||
| #bb_nu, #bb_lambda { | #bb_nu, #bb_lambda { | ||
| width: 100%; | width: 100%; | ||
| - | height: | + | height: |
| position: relative; | position: relative; | ||
| margin-bottom: | margin-bottom: | ||
| Line 117: | Line 32: | ||
| <div style=" | <div style=" | ||
| Temperature: | Temperature: | ||
| - | <input type=" | + | <input type=" |
| | | ||
| <span id=" | <span id=" | ||
| Line 123: | Line 38: | ||
| <script type=" | <script type=" | ||
| - | | + | window.PlotlyConfig = {MathJaxConfig: |
| </ | </ | ||
| <script src=" | <script src=" | ||
| Line 129: | Line 44: | ||
| <script type=" | <script type=" | ||
| //< | //< | ||
| - | const h=6.626e-34, | + | const h=6.626e-34, |
| - | const Bnu=(n, | + | |
| - | const Blambda=(l, | + | const N=400; |
| const logspace=(a, | const logspace=(a, | ||
| - | const nu=logspace(11, | ||
| - | const makeNuTrace=T=> | + | const nu_Hz = logspace(11, |
| - | const makeLambdaTrace=T=> | + | const lambda_m |
| + | |||
| + | const Bnu = (nu, | ||
| + | const Blambda = (lam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | const makeNuTrace = T => ({ | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | }); | ||
| + | |||
| + | const makeLambdaTrace = T => ({ | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | }); | ||
| + | |||
| + | // BIG equation text | ||
| + | const eq_nu = { | ||
| + | x: 0.97, y: 0.97, xref:' | ||
| + | text:' | ||
| + | showarrow: | ||
| + | font: | ||
| + | align:' | ||
| + | }; | ||
| + | |||
| + | const eq_lambda = { | ||
| + | x: 0.97, y: 0.97, xref:' | ||
| + | text:' | ||
| + | showarrow: | ||
| + | font: | ||
| + | align:' | ||
| + | }; | ||
| - | const layout_nu={ | + | const layout_nu = { |
| margin: | margin: | ||
| - | xaxis:{type:' | + | xaxis: |
| - | yaxis:{ | + | yaxis: |
| - | type:' | + | |
| - | tickformat:' | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | } | + | |
| }; | }; | ||
| - | const layout_lambda={ | + | const layout_lambda = { |
| margin: | margin: | ||
| - | xaxis:{type:' | + | xaxis: |
| - | yaxis:{ | + | yaxis: |
| - | type:' | + | |
| - | tickformat:' | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | } | + | |
| }; | }; | ||
| - | Plotly.newPlot(' | + | Plotly.newPlot(' |
| - | Plotly.newPlot(' | + | Plotly.newPlot(' |
| + | |||
| + | const slider=document.getElementById(' | ||
| + | const Tval=document.getElementById(' | ||
| - | const slider=document.getElementById(' | ||
| slider.oninput=function(){ | slider.oninput=function(){ | ||
| - | const T=+this.value; | + | const T = +this.value; |
| - | Tval.textContent=T; | + | Tval.textContent = T; |
| - | Plotly.react(' | + | Plotly.react(' |
| - | Plotly.react(' | + | Plotly.react(' |
| }; | }; | ||
| //]]> | //]]> | ||
| Line 177: | Line 117: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | In the wavelength representation, \(I(\lambda)\), the same underlying physics appears but with an important difference: the peak occurs at a different location | + | The derivation of the blackbody spectrum relies on the Bose-Einstein distribution function, which describes the statistical behavior of integer-spin particles (bosons) such as photons. In a phase space defined by position coordinates $\mathbf{x}$ and momentum vectors $\mathbf{p}$, |
| - | ===== Insights | + | $$f = \frac{2}{h^3} \frac{1}{e^{E/ |
| - | * Blackbody | + | Here, $h$ is Planck' |
| - | * The Planck | + | |
| - | | + | The specific intensity $I(\nu, T)$ is directly |
| - | | + | $$I(\nu, T) = \frac{2h\nu^3}{c^2} \frac{1}{e^{h\nu/kT} - 1}$$ |
| - | | + | This equation forms the basis for all subsequent characteristics of blackbody radiation. |
| - | * Dense, optically thick astrophysical regions such as stellar atmospheres and the early Universe closely approximate blackbody conditions. | + | |
| - | * Blackbody sources serve as calibration standards because their emission depends solely on temperature and follows universal laws. | + | ===== Rayleigh-Jeans approximation ===== |
| + | |||
| + | In the low-frequency limit, where the photon energy is much smaller than the thermal energy ($h\nu \ll kT$), the exponential term in the denominator of the Planck function can be approximated using the Taylor series expansion $e^x \approx 1 + x$. Substituting this into the specific intensity equation cancels the $h$ terms, resulting in the Rayleigh-Jeans law: | ||
| + | $$I(\nu, T) \approx \frac{2\nu^2 kT}{c^2}$$ | ||
| + | This approximation was historically significant as it corresponds to the classical prediction that failed | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Wien approximation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | At the opposite end of the spectrum, where frequencies are high and photon energy exceeds the thermal kinetic energy | ||
| + | $$I(\nu, T) \approx \frac{2h\nu^3}{c^2} e^{-h\nu/ | ||
| + | This is the Wien approximation. It describes the steep cutoff of the spectrum in the ultraviolet and X-ray regimes for typical stellar temperatures. The exponential factor dominates the $\nu^3$ term, ensuring that the total energy integrated over all frequencies remains finite, thus resolving the divergence predicted by classical physics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Wien's displacement law (frequency) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The spectral distribution of blackbody radiation peaks at a specific frequency $\nu_{peak}$ that shifts with temperature. Differentiating the Planck function with respect to $\nu$ and solving for the maximum yields a transcendental equation, the solution of which shows that the peak frequency is linearly proportional to temperature: | ||
| + | $$h\nu_{peak} = 2.82 kT$$ | ||
| + | This relationship implies that hotter objects emit the bulk of their energy at higher frequencies. For example, the Cosmic Microwave Background | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Wien's displacement law (wavelength) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | When the specific intensity is expressed per unit wavelength interval, $I_\lambda(\lambda, T)$, the condition for the spectral peak changes due to the nonlinear relationship between frequency and wavelength differentials ($d\nu = -c/\lambda^2 d\lambda$). The peak wavelength $\lambda_{peak}$ follows the familiar form of Wien's displacement law: | ||
| + | $$\lambda_{peak} T = 2.898 \times 10^{-3} \text{ K m}$$ | ||
| + | It is important to recognize that the peak of the spectrum in wavelength | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Stefan-Boltzmann law ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The total radiant flux $\mathcal{F}$ emitted from the surface of a blackbody is obtained by integrating the specific intensity over all frequencies ($0 \to \infty$) | ||
| + | $$\mathcal{F} = \sigma T^4$$ | ||
| + | where $\sigma \approx 5.67 \times 10^{-8} \text{ W m}^{-2} \text{ K}^{-4}$ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. For a spherical star of radius $R$, this flux definition leads to the luminosity equation $L = 4\pi R^2 \sigma T^4$. This law defines the effective temperature of stars, relating their total intrinsic power output to their physical size. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Spectral energy density | ||
| + | |||
| + | The spectral energy density $u_\nu(\nu, T)$ measures the amount of radiant energy contained within a unit volume of space per unit frequency interval. For isotropic | ||
| + | $$u_\nu(\nu, | ||
| + | This function | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Total energy density ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Integrating the spectral energy density over the entire | ||
| + | $$u(T) = a T^4$$ | ||
| + | The radiation constant $a$ is related to the Stefan-Boltzmann constant by $a = 4\sigma/c$. This relationship is critical in cosmology | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Spectral number density ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The spectral number density $n_\nu(\nu, T)$ defines the number of photons per unit volume per unit frequency | ||
| + | $$n_\nu(\nu, | ||
| + | Physically, this can be interpreted as the product of the density of quantum states in phase space (proportional to $\nu^2$) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Total number density ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The total number density of photons $n(T)$ is found by integrating $n_\nu$ over all frequencies. The result depends on the third power of the temperature, rather than the fourth: | ||
| + | $$n(T) \propto T^3$$ | ||
| + | Specifically, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Average photon energy ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The average energy of a photon in a blackbody radiation field is the ratio of the total energy density | ||
| + | $$h\nu_{avg} \approx 2.70 kT$$ | ||
| + | This value provides a useful rule of thumb for characteristic photon energies. It is slightly lower than the energy at the frequency peak ($2.82 kT$) but provides a representative energy for interactions such as ionization or scattering within a thermal plasma. | ||
| ===== Inquiries ===== | ===== Inquiries ===== | ||
| - | | + | |
| - | * Why do the Rayleigh–Jeans and Wien approximations follow from the limiting behavior of the exponential term in Planck’s law? | + | |
| - | | + | - Using the scaling relations provided, determine the factor by which the total luminosity of a spherical star increases if its temperature doubles while its radius remains constant. |
| + | - Contrast the temperature dependence of the total photon energy density ($u \propto T^4$) with that of the total photon number density ($n \propto T^3$) and explain what this implies for the average energy per photon as temperature changes. | ||
| + | - State the equation of state relating radiation pressure $P$ to total energy density $u$ for an isotropic blackbody field and identify the factor distinguishing it from the kinetic pressure of a non-relativistic gas. | ||
un/blackbody-radiation.1764436259.txt.gz · Last modified: by asad
