Abekta

Nothing human is alien to me

User Tools

Site Tools


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
un:beam [2024/06/30 05:26] – created asadun:beam [2024/07/14 20:47] (current) – [2. Effective area] asad
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Beam ====== ====== Beam ======
 +
 +===== - Power gain =====
 The beam or **power gain** of a radio antenna is nothing but directional gain, the gain that varies toward different direction written as $G(\theta,\phi)$. It is normalized to be $1$ at the center of the field of view of an antenna. The beam or **power gain** of a radio antenna is nothing but directional gain, the gain that varies toward different direction written as $G(\theta,\phi)$. It is normalized to be $1$ at the center of the field of view of an antenna.
  
Line 16: Line 18:
 where $G_0$ is the peak gain. For example, the gain pattern or radiation pattern of a short dipole where $G_0$ is the peak gain. For example, the gain pattern or radiation pattern of a short dipole
  
-$$ G = \frac{3}{2} \sin^2\theta $$ +$$ G = \frac{3}{2} \sin^2\theta = G_0 \sin^2\theta $$
  
 which can be derived from the formula of power for a [[dipole antenna]]. Here $G_0=3/2 = 1.5 = 1.76$ dB is the peak gain because this would be the gain at $\theta=90^\circ$. which can be derived from the formula of power for a [[dipole antenna]]. Here $G_0=3/2 = 1.5 = 1.76$ dB is the peak gain because this would be the gain at $\theta=90^\circ$.
 +
 +===== - Collecting area =====
 +For a receiving antenna, we use **effective area** instead of power gain for defining the beam. It is defined by the fact that flux is nothing but power per unit area. So the collecting area of a radio telescope (also called //effective area//)
 +
 +$$ A_e = \frac{2P}{S} $$
 +
 +where the factor $2$ is there because an antenna detects only half of the incident light from an unpolarized source. This can be derived using the following thought experiment.
 +
 +{{:un:cavity-antenna-resistor.png?nolink&400|}}
 +
 +Two cavities are in thermodynamic equilibrium, one has a resistor, the other an antenna. The antenna is connected to the resistor via a wire, so current of a specific frequency range can pass, but em wave cannot. The power received by the antenna
 +
 +$$ P_\nu = \frac{1}{2} \int_{4\pi} A_e(\theta,\phi) B_\nu d\Omega $$
 +
 +which can be calculated using [[Planck's law]] and [[Nyquist formula]]. Planck's law gives the radiation from a blackbody, a random mess of particles in thermal equilibrium. And the Nyquist formula gives the radiation from a warm a resistor, one that has been heated. All heated resistors radiate. The power of a warm resistor
 +
 +$$ P_\nu = kT \frac{h\nu/kT}{e^{h\nu/kT} - 1} $$
 +
 +and the intensity of a blackbody
 +
 +$$ B_\nu = \frac{2kT}{\lambda^2} \frac{h\nu/kT}{e^{h\nu/kT} - 1} $$
 +
 +which leads to
 +
 +$$ \langle A_e \rangle = \frac{\lambda^2}{4\pi} $$
 +
 +which means all isotropic lossless antennas have the same **collecting area** irrespective of their shape. This is the reason why GPS antennas, FM radio and dipole radio telescopes all work at long wavelengths, to increase the collecting area which is proportional to $\lambda^2$.
 +
 +And the **beam solid angle** of a lossless isotropic antenna
 +
 +$$ \Omega_A = \int_{4\pi} \frac{A_e}{A_0} d\Omega \Rightarrow A_0 \Omega_A = \lambda^2 $$
 +
 +where $A_0$ is the maximum or peak collecting area.
  
un/beam.1719746794.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/06/30 05:26 by asad

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki