Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
un:beam [2024/06/30 05:26] – created asad | un:beam [2024/07/14 20:47] (current) – [2. Effective area] asad | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Beam ====== | ====== Beam ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== - Power gain ===== | ||
The beam or **power gain** of a radio antenna is nothing but directional gain, the gain that varies toward different direction written as $G(\theta, | The beam or **power gain** of a radio antenna is nothing but directional gain, the gain that varies toward different direction written as $G(\theta, | ||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
where $G_0$ is the peak gain. For example, the gain pattern or radiation pattern of a short dipole | where $G_0$ is the peak gain. For example, the gain pattern or radiation pattern of a short dipole | ||
- | $$ G = \frac{3}{2} \sin^2\theta $$ | + | $$ G = \frac{3}{2} |
which can be derived from the formula of power for a [[dipole antenna]]. Here $G_0=3/2 = 1.5 = 1.76$ dB is the peak gain because this would be the gain at $\theta=90^\circ$. | which can be derived from the formula of power for a [[dipole antenna]]. Here $G_0=3/2 = 1.5 = 1.76$ dB is the peak gain because this would be the gain at $\theta=90^\circ$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== - Collecting area ===== | ||
+ | For a receiving antenna, we use **effective area** instead of power gain for defining the beam. It is defined by the fact that flux is nothing but power per unit area. So the collecting area of a radio telescope (also called //effective area//) | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ A_e = \frac{2P}{S} $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | where the factor $2$ is there because an antenna detects only half of the incident light from an unpolarized source. This can be derived using the following thought experiment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Two cavities are in thermodynamic equilibrium, | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ P_\nu = \frac{1}{2} \int_{4\pi} A_e(\theta, | ||
+ | |||
+ | which can be calculated using [[Planck' | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ P_\nu = kT \frac{h\nu/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | and the intensity of a blackbody | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ B_\nu = \frac{2kT}{\lambda^2} \frac{h\nu/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | which leads to | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ \langle A_e \rangle = \frac{\lambda^2}{4\pi} $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | which means all isotropic lossless antennas have the same **collecting area** irrespective of their shape. This is the reason why GPS antennas, FM radio and dipole radio telescopes all work at long wavelengths, | ||
+ | |||
+ | And the **beam solid angle** of a lossless isotropic antenna | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ \Omega_A = \int_{4\pi} \frac{A_e}{A_0} d\Omega \Rightarrow A_0 \Omega_A = \lambda^2 $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | where $A_0$ is the maximum or peak collecting area. | ||
un/beam.1719746794.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/06/30 05:26 by asad